Abstract
A criterion for biasing a binary decision requiring an unequal protection (Fig 1) which utilizes a measured signal to interference ratio (SIR). The SIR may be derived from a determination of channel estimation. The SIR is compared against a threshold the threshold being selected to bias the decision toward a NACK as opposed to an ACK determination. The technique is advantageous for providing biased binary decisions for high speed downlink packets (HSDP) but may be utilized for both uplink and downlink applications.
A criterion for biasing a binary decision requiring an unequal protection (Fig 1) which utilizes a measured signal to interference ratio (SIR). The SIR may be derived from a determination of channel estimation. The SIR is compared against a threshold the threshold being selected to bias the decision toward a NACK as opposed to an ACK determination. The technique is advantageous for providing biased binary decisions for high speed downlink packets (HSDP) but may be utilized for both uplink and downlink applications.
Technology | Declaration Information | Specification Information | Explicitly Disclosed | Patent Type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declaration Date | Declaration Reference | Declaring Company | Specification Number | ||||||
3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member |
Specification Information
Specification Information
Technologies
Family Information
All Granted Patents In Patent Family : | ---- |
All Pending Patents In Patent Family : | ---- |
Publication No | Technology | Declaration Information | Specification Information | Explicitly Disclosed | Patent Type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declaration Date | Declaration Reference | Declaring Company | Specification Number | |||||||
US2004005903A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Basis Patent | |||
US7428425B2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Basis Patent | |||
AR038569A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
AU2003217588A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
EP1476964A4 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
EP1476964A4 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
HK1053587A2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
HK1053587A2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
HK1053589A2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
HK1053589A2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100854426B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100854426B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20040070459A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20040070459A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100684561B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100684561B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20040066069A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20040066069A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100954748B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100954748B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20050099600A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20050099600A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100934681B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100934681B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20050096904A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20050096904A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100914536B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100914536B1 | 3G | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100914536B1 | Not Available | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20080019677A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20080019677A | 3G | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20080019677A | Not Available | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100954746B1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR100954746B1 | 3G | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR100954746B1 | Not Available | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20080029986A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR20080029986A | 3G | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
KR20080029986A | Not Available | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
TW200306102A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TW200306102A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
TWI246839B | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TWI246839B | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
TW585379U | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TW586716U | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
US2008273469A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
US7904107B2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
WO03071717A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
WO03071717A1 | 3G | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
WO03071717A1 | Not Available | 18/09/2008 | ISLD-200901-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
|
Yes | Family Member | |||
US2011159900A1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
US8116804B2 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TW200943812A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TW200423574A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TWI325241B | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
CN2731876Y | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
CN2772162Y | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
DE20302714U1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
DE20302715U1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR200319464Y1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
KR200329899Y1 | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
MY154973A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TW200711368A | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member | |||
TWI350081B | 3G | 20/03/2007 | ISLD-200802-001 | INTERDIGITAL INC |
S1
S2
|
No | Family Member |
Publication No | Technology | Declaration Information | Specification Information | Explicitly Disclosed | Patent Type | Status | National Phase Entries | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declaration Date | Declaration Reference | Declaring Company | Specification Information | |||||||||
----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- |
S1
|
----- | ----- | ----- | ----- |
Technologies

Product
Use Cases

Services
Claim
1. A method for biasing criteria for binary decisions requiring unequal protection in a wireless communication system, comprising: receiving a communication in a given channel; obtaining a signal to interference ratio (SIR) of the communication channel; and comparing the SIR against a given threshold, said threshold being selected to bias the criteria toward a transmission of a (NACK) condition to indicate that a received communication should be retransmitted.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said SIR is obtained by initially obtaining a channel estimation and deriving the SIR from the channel estimation.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of comparing comprises: determining the threshold by combining, with noise, each of a plurality of test signals having signal strengths extending over a given range; determining correctness of each combined signal; determining instances of correct signals and incorrect signals at each signal strength; and selecting a threshold which provides an acceptable number of false declarations of an ACK condition.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the comparing step includes using signal amplitude as a measure of signal strength.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein the threshold is preferably greater than a level of the noise taken alone.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of comparing comprises: setting the threshold to a level that is low enough so that an acceptable low frequency of errors occurs for SIRs above the threshold and high enough to prevent an unacceptable high number of errors for SIRs below the threshold.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the channel estimation is based on a communication from a sender.
8. The method of claim 3 wherein the sender temporarily stores the communication sent to the receiver.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the sender, upon receipt of a NACK signal retransmits the temporarily stored communication
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the receiver transmits an ACK condition acknowledging receipt of an error free communication
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said sender, upon receipt of an ACK signal clears the temporarily stored communication
12. Apparatus for biasing criteria for binary decisions requiring unequal protection in a wireless communication system, comprising: means for receiving a communication in a given channel; means for obtaining a signal to interference ratio (SIR) of the communication channel; and means for comparing the SIR against a given threshold, said threshold being selected to bias the criteria toward a transmission of a (NACK) condition to indicate that a received communication should be retransmitted
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said SIR is obtained by means for initially obtaining a channel estimation, said means for obtaining deriving the SIR from the channel estimation
14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the means for comparing comprises: means for determining the threshold by combining, with noise, each of a plurality of test signals having signal strengths extending over a given range; means for determining correctness of each combined signal; means for determining instances of correct signals and incorrect signals at each signal strength; and means for selecting a threshold which provides an acceptable number of false declarations of an ACK condition
15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the means for comparing further comprises means using signal amplitude as a measure of signal strength
16. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the threshold is preferably greater than a signal strength of a noise signal taken alone
17. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein means for initially obtaining the channel estimation is based on a communication means of a sender.', "18. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein the sender's communication means includes means for temporarily storing the communication sent to the receiver."19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the sender is provided with means for receiving a NACK signal and means to retransmit a temporarily stored communication responsive to the means for receiving.
20. The apparatus of claim 12 further comprising means for transmitting an ACK condition acknowledging receipt of an error free communication when the SIR is greater than the threshold.
21. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein means are provided for receiving an ACK condition and means for clearing a temporarily stored communication responsive to said means for receiving an ACK condition.
22. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the means for comparing comprises: means for setting the threshold to a level that is low enough so that an acceptable low frequency of errors occurs for SIRs above the threshold and high enough to prevent an unacceptable high number of errors for SIRs below the threshold.']
Associated Portfolios

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Claim charts will soon be available!
|
SUMMARY
ClaimChart-EP1476964A1-STO
Patent number:EP1476964A1
Claim Chart Type : SEP Claim Chart
Price: 200 €
To view claim charts you must become a Gold or Platinum Member.
Upgrade your subscriptionYou have reached the maximum number of patents which can be associated to your account per your subscription. If you wish to associate more patents
Please upgrade your subscription.Note:
The information in blue was extracted from the third parties (Standard Setting Organisation, Espacenet)
The information in grey was provided by the patent holder
The information in purple was extracted from the FrandAvenue
Explicitly disclosed patent:openly and comprehensibly describes all details of the invention in the patent document.
Implicitly disclosed patent:does not explicitly state certain aspects of the invention, but still allows for these to be inferred from the information provided.
Basis patent:The core patent in a family, outlining the fundamental invention from which related patents or applications originate.
Family member:related patents or applications that share a common priority or original filing.